<body><script type="text/javascript"> function setAttributeOnload(object, attribute, val) { if(window.addEventListener) { window.addEventListener('load', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }, false); } else { window.attachEvent('onload', function(){ object[attribute] = val; }); } } </script> <div id="navbar-iframe-container"></div> <script type="text/javascript" src="https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> gapi.load("gapi.iframes:gapi.iframes.style.bubble", function() { if (gapi.iframes && gapi.iframes.getContext) { gapi.iframes.getContext().openChild({ url: 'https://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID\x3d12263352\x26blogName\x3dExtreme+Truths\x26publishMode\x3dPUBLISH_MODE_BLOGSPOT\x26navbarType\x3dBLACK\x26layoutType\x3dCLASSIC\x26searchRoot\x3dhttp://extremetruths.blogspot.com/search\x26blogLocale\x3den_US\x26v\x3d2\x26homepageUrl\x3dhttp://extremetruths.blogspot.com/\x26vt\x3d3256311717127751195', where: document.getElementById("navbar-iframe-container"), id: "navbar-iframe" }); } }); </script>

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

You Knew this was Coming...
Bill softens bestiality statute

The Gay State of Massachusetts has really taken the cake this time. LEGALIZING BESTIALITY. Well Kind of.

State Sen. Cynthia Creem, Sen. Robert O'Leary, Rep. Michael Festa and Rep. David Linsky have introduced Senate bill 938. "The bill would strike down several sections of the current penal code criminalizing adultery, fornication and the advertisement of abortion," the reported stated. "It also repeals what appears to be a sodomy statute forbidding 'abominable and detestable crime against nature, either with mankind or with a beast.'

From WND:While the bill would keep bestiality technically illegal, it gives the option of less severe penalties. Previously, those convicted of "a sexual act on an animal" could receive up to 20 years in prison.

Explains the local weekly: "The new measure would give activist judges the option of slapping perps with a mere two and a half years in plush local jails, or even letting zoophiliacs walk with a $5,000 fine."

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Alito, Abortion and Radicalism?

I'm so mad I can spit fiery nails threw my teeth right now. Actually the anger started last night. Letting the sun go down on my anger disrupted my sleep and awakened me with an attitude, rightfully so.

For some of you who read my other blog, you have heard me say, I don't watch much tv anymore and certainly NOT the nightly snooze. The likes of Dan Blabber and Tom Brokejaw sent me away years ago, especially when I started reading alternative media and "THINKING FOR MYSELF!".
The only days I rarely watch the news is when it is sandwiched between 2 shows I want to see and there is not anything to turn too, case in point: I watch Medium on monday nights, I also like when Jay Leno does "Headlines" on the tonight show. I don't see it too often as I usually fall asleep just after medium. However last night I was wide awake, so I sat thru the snooze waiting for Jay to do Headlines so I can sleep after laughing my butt off.

They had a story the ticked me off. Well actually most of the B.S. theywere spewing ticked me off but this one in general was about Judge Alito's writing about the Constitution and Abortion. Now I have NOT been keeping up with a lot of news, pro-life or otherwise, as of late for personal reasons- ( my life is changing direction again, and I am trying to keep my emotions in check so I don't stagnate), but when I heard the comments by the snooze heads, I was flawed at the way they were shaping opinions.

"Judge Alito's Words regarding abortion and the constitution haunting him?"
I Thought, "what?" So I waited thru the commercials, ZZZzzzz for the news item and they were talking as if HE was SOOO from the Cave Era for saying the Constitution does not Guarantee a womans right to kill her child.
They had clips of protest marchers for choice followed by a flash of a pro-life sign , followed by more pro-choice women, (mostly) and the commentators were calling anyone who stood for PRO-LIFE- "THE RADICAL RIGHT"!!!! I have heard the term used for people who are against Homosexuality, and even Christians, of which I ascribe to in both parks, But to say we are RADICAL because we believe Life is sacred?????

Well you know what? I am going out on a limb and I am going to design my little radical slogan to sell for all of those who like me are radical!
A slogan I used to put in my taglines, that has gotten me into a few arguments, but is not my idea, it was Inspired in prayer. I asked GOD to help me with words, common sense, that would reach people on the street, "The Worldly People." Maybe he just cleared some of the cobwebs in my brain to help me see what I was thinking all along, maybe he put them there, in any event, It is the Answer to Womens Choice, a radical answer by one Radical GOD!
I will post the link when I am done.

Friday, November 11, 2005

'Revoked' living-will death stirs fervent online debate

While I saw this story when I first got my internet turned on after moving, I refused to blog on it, figuring the rest of blogsphere was doing so. It also raised my emotions to the point where I had to walk away, hence I have not been posting on serious issues. I am trying to keep my blood pressure on an even keel but this is not going away and it just done ticked me off this morning!

The fact that living wills can be revoked is alarming and frightening.
Having dealt with this situation regarding my mother I know all too well the emotional rollercoaster and the pain involved in making decisions about ending someones life. ( I still question myself and struggle with the demons of it to this day!)

This man however was all about staying alive as was Terri Schindler. The fact that the hospital staff let his alarms go off and did nothing about it warrants an investigation.
In my opinion I believe the wife was looking for an easy out, when she signed the DNR papers.
People change their minds about life and death decisions, In my early twenties I would have most likely had been put to death given statements I had made about life and death and incapacitation. Today I will state emphatically for the record, I want to be kept alive, no matter the cost involved.

I watched an old tv recording I had, in it was Dr. Stephen Hawkings, Brilliant man with a Brilliant Mind. He had lou Gehrigs disease I believe, but his mind was sharp as a tack, he could not however communicate the usual way, orally.

Using computers and his eyes he was able to speak out about the state of technology and its use in medical as well as other things.

To think that this man would have been put to death because he had less movement the Terri Schindler, and could not even voice a noise, while his mind is fluidly aware is terrifying.

LIVING WILLS? NOPE!

Family say so? Nope! If you do not state in such detailed way and even then who is to say you "Arent in there" as many people who have come out of comas and coma like states have reported, if you cannot find a way to communicate with people.

We have come to a place in time where we all have to have knowledge of medical ins and outs to understand the functioning body. We have to know in the future if we will have our mind in tact. This puts us in a precarious situation. Do you , reader, know what the end of your life will be like? Can you say with certainty whether or not you would want to live given "ANY" set of circumstances? What if you become comatose? You don't know for sure whether or not your mind will still be with you?
Given the margin of era, the reports of those who have come back and stated they heard it all, and the fact that perhaps the mind is the last thing to go after the body fails, I will err on the side of LIFE!